netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <57A9B006-C6FC-463D-BA05-D927126899BB@oracle.com>
Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2023 23:58:55 +0000
From:   Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "zbr@...emap.net" <zbr@...emap.net>,
        "brauner@...nel.org" <brauner@...nel.org>,
        "johannes@...solutions.net" <johannes@...solutions.net>,
        "ecree.xilinx@...il.com" <ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
        "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
        "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "socketcan@...tkopp.net" <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        "petrm@...dia.com" <petrm@...dia.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering



> On Apr 3, 2023, at 1:50 PM, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 2 Apr 2023 02:32:19 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>>> Who are you hoping will merge this?  
>> Could I request you to look into merging the patches which seem ok to
>> you, since you are listed as the maintainer for these? I can make any
>> more changes for the connector patches if you see the need..
> 
> The first two, you mean? We can merge them, but we need to know that
> the rest is also going somewhere. Kernel has a rule against merging
> APIs without any in-tree users, so we need a commitment that the
> user will also reach linux-next before the merge window :(
> 
Jakub, could you please look into reviewing patches 3,4 & 5 as well? Patch 4 is just test code. Patch 3 is fixing bug fixes in current code so should be good to have - also it is not too connector specific. I can explain patch 5 in more detail if needed.
> Christian was commenting on previous releases maybe he can take or just
> review the last 4 patches?
Christian, could you please look into reviewing patch 6? This just deals with who can get the exit notifications.

Thanks
Anjali