netdev - [net PATCH v2 2/9] octeontx2-af: mcs: Write TCAM_DATA and TCAM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 26 Apr 2023 11:55:21 +0530
From:   Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>
To:     <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <kuba@...nel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        <sgoutham@...vell.com>, <gakula@...vell.com>,
        <sbhatta@...vell.com>, <hkelam@...vell.com>
Subject: [net PATCH v2 2/9] octeontx2-af: mcs: Write TCAM_DATA and TCAM_MASK registers at once

From: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>

As per hardware errata on CN10KB, all the four TCAM_DATA
and TCAM_MASK registers has to be written at once otherwise
write to individual registers will fail. Hence write to all
TCAM_DATA registers and then to all TCAM_MASK registers.

Fixes: cfc14181d497 ("octeontx2-af: cn10k: mcs: Manage the MCS block hardware resources")
Signed-off-by: Subbaraya Sundeep <sbhatta@...vell.com>
Signed-off-by: Sunil Kovvuri Goutham <sgoutham@...vell.com>
Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <gakula@...vell.com>
Reviewed-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
index 492baa0b594c..148417d633a5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/octeontx2/af/mcs.c
@@ -473,6 +473,8 @@ void mcs_flowid_entry_write(struct mcs *mcs, u64 *data, u64 *mask, int flow_id,
 		for (reg_id = 0; reg_id < 4; reg_id++) {
 			reg = MCSX_CPM_RX_SLAVE_FLOWID_TCAM_DATAX(reg_id, flow_id);
 			mcs_reg_write(mcs, reg, data[reg_id]);
+		}
+		for (reg_id = 0; reg_id < 4; reg_id++) {
 			reg = MCSX_CPM_RX_SLAVE_FLOWID_TCAM_MASKX(reg_id, flow_id);
 			mcs_reg_write(mcs, reg, mask[reg_id]);
 		}
@@ -480,6 +482,8 @@ void mcs_flowid_entry_write(struct mcs *mcs, u64 *data, u64 *mask, int flow_id,
 		for (reg_id = 0; reg_id < 4; reg_id++) {
 			reg = MCSX_CPM_TX_SLAVE_FLOWID_TCAM_DATAX(reg_id, flow_id);
 			mcs_reg_write(mcs, reg, data[reg_id]);
+		}
+		for (reg_id = 0; reg_id < 4; reg_id++) {
 			reg = MCSX_CPM_TX_SLAVE_FLOWID_TCAM_MASKX(reg_id, flow_id);
 			mcs_reg_write(mcs, reg, mask[reg_id]);
 		}
-- 
2.25.1