[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a2f09b8a-add5-6bc4-64d2-6ac67e334fe0@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2023 11:44:10 +0200
From: Alexandra Winter <wintera@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC net] net/mlx5: Fix performance regression for
request-response workloads
On 29.12.22 09:27, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>
>
> On 01.10.22 01:37, Saeed Mahameed wrote:
>> On 26 Sep 12:06, Alexandra Winter wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>>
>>> Saeed,
>>> As discussed at LPC, could you please consider adding a workaround to the
>>> Mellanox driver, to use non-SG SKBs for small messages? As mentioned above
>>> we are seeing 13% throughput degradation, if 2 pages need to be mapped
>>> instead of 1.
>>>
>>> While Eric's ideas sound very promising, just using non-SG in these cases
>>> should be enough to mitigate the performance regression we see.
>>
>> Hi Alexandra, sorry for the late response.
>>
>> Yeas linearizing small messages makes sense, but will require some careful
>> perf testing.
>>
>> We will do our best to include this in the next kernel release cycle.
>> I will take it with the mlx5e team next week, everybody is on vacation this
>> time of year :).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Saeed.
>
> Hello Saeed,
> may I ask whether you had a chance to include such a patch in the 6.2 kernel?
> Or is this still on your ToDo list?
> I haven't seen anything like this on the mailing list, but I may have overlooked it.
> All the best for 2023
> Alexandra
Hello Saeed,
any news about linearizing small messages? Is there any way we could be of help?
Kind regards
Alexandra
Powered by blists - more mailing lists