netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] wifi: ath11k: Use list_count

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2023 07:35:09 +0300
From:   Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To:     Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc:     "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, ath11k@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] wifi: ath11k: Use list_count_nodes()

Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr> writes:

> ath11k_wmi_fw_stats_num_vdevs() and ath11k_wmi_fw_stats_num_bcn() really
> look the same as list_count_nodes(), so use the latter instead of hand
> writing it.
>
> The first ones use list_for_each_entry() and the other list_for_each(), but
> they both count the number of nodes in the list.
>
> While at it, also remove to prototypes of non-existent functions.
> Based on the names and prototypes, it is likely that they should be
> equivalent to list_count_nodes().
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
> ---
> Un-tested

I'll run sanity tests on ath11k patches. I'll also add "Compile tested
only" to the commit log.

Oh, and ath11k patches go to ath tree, not net-next.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches