netdev - Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] net: phy: motorcomm: Add pad drive strength cfg support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <988e7ff1-ef0e-6224-98fb-e3d564806477@starfivetech.com>
Date:   Thu, 27 Apr 2023 14:46:26 +0800
From:   Guo Samin <samin.guo@...rfivetech.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Frank Sae <Frank.Sae@...or-comm.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Yanhong Wang <yanhong.wang@...rfivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] net: phy: motorcomm: Add pad drive strength cfg
 support


Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] net: phy: motorcomm: Add pad drive strength cfg support
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
to: Frank Sae <Frank.Sae@...or-comm.com>
data: 2023/4/26

>>> +	u32 val;
>>>  
>>>  	ret = ytphy_rgmii_clk_delay_config_with_lock(phydev);
>>>  	if (ret < 0)
>>> @@ -1518,6 +1524,32 @@ static int yt8531_config_init(struct phy_device *phydev)
>>>  			return ret;
>>>  	}
>>>  
>>> +	if (!of_property_read_u32(node, "rx-clk-driver-strength", &val)) {
>>
>> Please check the val of "val", add the handle of default value.
> 
> You can assign val to 3, or better still some #define, before calling
> of_property_read_u32(). If the property is not found, val will retain
> that value, and you can then write it to the register.
> 
> But please do add range checks for when val is in DT. We don't want
> anybody using 42. -EINVAL should be returned.
> 
> 	Andrew

Thanks, good advice. 

Best regards,
Samin