[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZEwiw+zPc7Wdyixf@corigine.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 21:47:15 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] wifi: ath10k: Use list_count_nodes()
On Wed, Apr 26, 2023 at 10:49:07PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> ath10k_wmi_fw_stats_num_peers() and ath10k_wmi_fw_stats_num_vdevs() really
> look the same as list_count_nodes(), so use the latter instead of hand
> writing it.
>
> The first ones use list_for_each_entry() and the other list_for_each(), but
> they both count the number of nodes in the list.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists