netdev - Re: MT7530 bug, forward broadcast and unknown frames to the correct CPU port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 29 Apr 2023 21:56:57 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
Cc:     DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>, Greg Ungerer <gerg@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>,
        Richard van Schagen <richard@...terhints.com>,
        Richard van Schagen <vschagen@...com>,
        Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
        mithat.guner@...ont.com, erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com,
        bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be, netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: MT7530 bug, forward broadcast and unknown frames to the correct
 CPU port

On Sat, Apr 29, 2023 at 09:39:41PM +0300, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
> Are you fine with the preferred port patch now that I mentioned port 6
> would be preferred for MT7531BE since it's got 2.5G whilst port 5 has
> got 1G? Would you like to submit it or leave it to me to send the diff
> above and this?

No, please tell me: what real life difference would it make to a user
who doesn't care to analyze which CPU port is used?