[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <44fe99ec-42a0-688f-16a0-0a3be3750290@mistywest.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 12:57:04 -0700
From: Ron Eggler <ron.eggler@...tywest.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unable to TX data on VSC8531
Hi Andrew,
On 4/30/23 07:23, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 30, 2023 at 07:08:21AM -0700, Ron Eggler wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've posted here previously about the bring up of two network interfaces on
>> an embedded platform that is using two the Microsemi VSC8531 PHYs. (previous
>> thread: issues to bring up two VSC8531 PHYs, Thanks to Heiner Kallweit &
>> Andrew Lunn).
>> I'm able to seemingly fully access & operate the network interfaces through
>> ifconfig (and the ip commands) and I set the ip address to match my /24
>> network. However, while it looks like I can receive & see traffic on the
>> line with tcpdump
> So receive definitely works?
It would appear so as I can monitor traffic that's on the line with
tcpdump and my arp table sometimes gets populated when an arp broadcast
for an incomplete entry in the table can be picked up (due to other
traffic on the network).
> It is a long shot, but a couple of decades ago, i had a board where
> the PHY came up in loopback mode. All transmits never went out the
> cable, they just came straight back again.
>
> When running tcpdump during transmit, do you see each packet twice?
Good idea, I tried this out but cannot make out anything related to
pings (or arp requests) in tcpdump when I ping at the same time.
However, one thing:
After a fresh rebootI executed:
# ping 192.168.1.222 -c 1
and see the following:
# ifconfig
eth0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 metric 1
inet 192.168.1.123 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
ether be:a8:27:1f:63:6e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 469 bytes 103447 (101.0 KiB)
RX errors 0 dropped 203 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 170
eth1: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 metric 1
ether fe:92:66:6c:4e:24 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
device interrupt 173
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 metric 1
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 1 bytes 112 (112.0 B)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 1 bytes 112 (112.0 B)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
it appears like the ping got sent to the loopback device instead of the
eth0, is this possible?
The routing table looks like:
# route
Kernel IP routing table
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use
Iface
192.168.1.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth0
What's going on here?
> Please run mii-tool on the interface. e.g. for my device:
>
> mii-tool -vv enp2s0:
> Using SIOCGMIIPHY=0x8947
> enp2s0:: no link
> registers for MII PHY 0:
> 1040 79c9 001c c800 0de1 0000 0064 0000
> 0000 0200 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 2000
> 0000 0000 ffff 0000 0000 0400 0f00 0f00
> 319b 0053 1002 80d9 84ca 0000 0000 0000
> product info: vendor 00:e0:4c or 00:07:32, model 0 rev 0
> basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
> basic status: no link
> capabilities: 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
> advertising: 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD flow-control
I got the following:
# mii-tool -vv eth0
Using SIOCGMIIPHY=0x8947
eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok
registers for MII PHY 0:
1040 796d 0007 0572 01e1 45e1 0007 2801
0000 0300 4000 0000 0000 0000 0000 3000
9000 0000 0008 0000 0000 0000 3201 1000
0000 a020 a000 0000 802d 0021 0400 0000
product info: vendor 00:01:c1, model 23 rev 2
basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok
capabilities: 1000baseT-HD 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD
10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
advertising: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
link partner: 1000baseT-HD 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD
10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD flow-control
--
Ron
Powered by blists - more mailing lists