[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c2db687-fdf8-1f6b-9d97-2ec98435fdf8@mistywest.com>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2023 13:23:51 -0700
From: Ron Eggler <ron.eggler@...tywest.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Unable to TX data on VSC8531
On 5/1/23 13:12, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> After a fresh rebootI executed:
>>
>> # ping 192.168.1.222 -c 1
>>
>> and see the following:
>>
>> # ifconfig
>> eth0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 metric 1
>> inet 192.168.1.123 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255
>> ether be:a8:27:1f:63:6e txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
>> RX packets 469 bytes 103447 (101.0 KiB)
>> RX errors 0 dropped 203 overruns 0 frame 0
>> TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
>> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>> device interrupt 170
>>
>> eth1: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 metric 1
>> ether fe:92:66:6c:4e:24 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet)
>> RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
>> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
>> TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B)
>> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>> device interrupt 173
>>
>> lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 metric 1
>> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
>> loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
>> RX packets 1 bytes 112 (112.0 B)
>> RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
>> TX packets 1 bytes 112 (112.0 B)
>> TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
>>
>> it appears like the ping got sent to the loopback device instead of the
>> eth0, is this possible?
> It is unlikely. Loopback is used for lots of things. Rather than -c 1,
> leave it running. There should be an arp sent around once a
> second. See if the statistics for lo go up at that rate.
Yes, the TX packets on lo actually do increase every second or so when I
have a ping running,
it's not 1 packet at a time but rather 3 or 4, it's nnot fully
consistent, when I scroll back the TX packets on the lo interface
increased like:
23
26
30
33
37
40
>> I got the following:
>>
>> # mii-tool -vv eth0
>> Using SIOCGMIIPHY=0x8947
>> eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok
>> registers for MII PHY 0:
>> 1040 796d 0007 0572 01e1 45e1 0007 2801
>> 0000 0300 4000 0000 0000 0000 0000 3000
>> 9000 0000 0008 0000 0000 0000 3201 1000
>> 0000 a020 a000 0000 802d 0021 0400 0000
>> product info: vendor 00:01:c1, model 23 rev 2
>> basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
>> basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok
>> capabilities: 1000baseT-HD 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD
>> 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
>> advertising: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
>> link partner: 1000baseT-HD 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD
>> 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD flow-control
> So you have the register values to answer Horatiu question.
Yes, I realized now only that mii-tool provides a pretty output like this.
Thanks for that!
--
Ron
Powered by blists - more mailing lists