[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230502172231.GH1597538@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 19:22:32 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Christian Benvenuti <benve@...co.com>,
Nelson Escobar <neescoba@...co.com>,
Bernard Metzler <bmt@...ich.ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Bjorn Topel <bjorn@...nel.org>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>,
Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
Mika Penttila <mpenttil@...hat.com>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/3] mm/gup: disallow FOLL_LONGTERM GUP-fast writing
to file-backed mappings
On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 07:13:49PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> [...]
>
> > +{
> > + struct address_space *mapping;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * GUP-fast disables IRQs - this prevents IPIs from causing page tables
> > + * to disappear from under us, as well as preventing RCU grace periods
> > + * from making progress (i.e. implying rcu_read_lock()).
> > + *
> > + * This means we can rely on the folio remaining stable for all
> > + * architectures, both those that set CONFIG_MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
> > + * and those that do not.
> > + *
> > + * We get the added benefit that given inodes, and thus address_space,
> > + * objects are RCU freed, we can rely on the mapping remaining stable
> > + * here with no risk of a truncation or similar race.
> > + */
> > + lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If no mapping can be found, this implies an anonymous or otherwise
> > + * non-file backed folio so in this instance we permit the pin.
> > + *
> > + * shmem and hugetlb mappings do not require dirty-tracking so we
> > + * explicitly whitelist these.
> > + *
> > + * Other non dirty-tracked folios will be picked up on the slow path.
> > + */
> > + mapping = folio_mapping(folio);
> > + return !mapping || shmem_mapping(mapping) || folio_test_hugetlb(folio);
>
> "Folios in the swap cache return the swap mapping" -- you might disallow
> pinning anonymous pages that are in the swap cache.
>
> I recall that there are corner cases where we can end up with an anon page
> that's mapped writable but still in the swap cache ... so you'd fallback to
> the GUP slow path (acceptable for these corner cases, I guess), however
> especially the comment is a bit misleading then.
>
> So I'd suggest not dropping the folio_test_anon() check, or open-coding it
> ... which will make this piece of code most certainly easier to get when
> staring at folio_mapping(). Or to spell it out in the comment (usually I
> prefer code over comments).
So how stable is folio->mapping at this point? Can two subsequent reads
get different values? (eg. an actual mapping and NULL)
If so, folio_mapping() itself seems to be missing a READ_ONCE() to avoid
the compiler from emitting the load multiple times.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists