[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230502071135.bcxg5nip62m7wndb@soft-dev3-1>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 09:11:35 +0200
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To: Ron Eggler <ron.eggler@...tywest.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Unable to TX data on VSC8531
The 05/01/2023 13:34, Ron Eggler wrote:
Hi Ron,
>
> Hi Horatiu,
>
> [snip greetings]
>
> > I've posted here previously about the bring up of two network interfaces
> > on an embedded platform that is using two the Microsemi VSC8531 PHYs.
> > (previous thread: issues to bring up two VSC8531 PHYs, Thanks to Heiner
> > Kallweit & Andrew Lunn).
> > I'm able to seemingly fully access & operate the network interfaces
> > through ifconfig (and the ip commands) and I set the ip address to match
> > my /24 network. However, while it looks like I can receive & see traffic
> > on the line with tcpdump, it appears like none of my frames can go out
> > in TX direction and hence entries in my arp table mostly remain
> > incomplete (and if there actually happens to be a complete entry,
> > sending anything to it doesn't seem to work and the TX counters in
> > ifconfig stay at 0. How can I further troubleshoot this? I have set the
> > phy-mode to rgmii-id in the device tree and have experimented with all
> > the TX_CLK delay register settings in the PHY but have failed to make
> > any progress.
> > Some of the VSC phys have this COMA mode, and then you need to pull
> > down a GPIO to take it out of this mode. I looked a little bit but I
> > didn't find anything like this for VSC8531 but maybe you can double
> > check this. But in that case both the RX and TX will not work.
> > Are there any errors seen in the registers 16 (0x10) or register 17
> > (0x11)?
> Good point rewgarding the COMA mode, I have not found anything like it.
> The RGMII connectivity should be pretty straight forward per the
> datasheet, TX0-TX4, TX_CLK, TX_CTL, RXD0-RXD4, RX_CLK & RX_CTL.
> Not sure if you've seen this in the subthread that is ongoing with
> Andrew Lunn but as part of it, I did invoke the mii-tool and got a
> pretty printout of the PHY registers, see below:
>
> # mii-tool -vv eth0
> Using SIOCGMIIPHY=0x8947
> eth0: negotiated 100baseTx-FD, link ok
> registers for MII PHY 0:
> 1040 796d 0007 0572 01e1 45e1 0005 2801
> 0000 0300 4000 0000 0000 0000 0000 3000
> 9000 0000 0008 0000 0000 0000 3201 1000
> 0000 a020 0000 0000 802d 0021 0400 0000
Unfortunetly, I can't see anything obvious wrong with the registers.
> product info: vendor 00:01:c1, model 23 rev 2
> basic mode: autonegotiation enabled
> basic status: autonegotiation complete, link ok
> capabilities: 1000baseT-HD 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD
> 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
> advertising: 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD
Are you expecting to run at 100Mbit?
> link partner: 1000baseT-HD 1000baseT-FD 100baseTx-FD 100baseTx-HD
> 10baseT-FD 10baseT-HD flow-control
>
> Alternartively, the registers can be read with phytool also:
>
> # phytool read eth0/0/0x10
> 0x9000
> # phytool read eth0/0/0x11
> 0000
Another thing that you can try, is to put a probe and see if you
actually see the TXCLK? And if I understand correctly that should be at
25MHz (because the link speed is 100Mbit).
>
> --
> Ron
--
/Horatiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists