netdev - Re: [BUG] Dependence of routing cache entries on the ignore-df flag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230503113528.315485f1@hermes.local>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 11:35:28 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Aleksey Shumnik <ashumnik9@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, waltje@...lt.nl.mugnet.org, Jakub Kicinski
 <kuba@...nel.org>, gw4pts@...pts.ampr.org, kuznet@....inr.ac.ru,
 "willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com" <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>,
 gnault@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] Dependence of routing cache entries on the ignore-df flag

On Wed, 3 May 2023 18:01:03 +0300
Aleksey Shumnik <ashumnik9@...il.com> wrote:

> Might you answer the questions:
> 1. How the ignore-df flag and adding entries to the routing cache is
> connected? In which kernel files may I look to find this connection?
> 2. Is this behavior wrong?
> 3. Is there any way to completely disable the use of the routing
> cache? (as far as I understand, it used to be possible to set the
> rhash_entries parameter to 0, but now there is no such parameter)
> 4. Why is an entry added to the routing cache if a suitable entry was
> eventually found in the arp table (it is added directly, without being
> temporarily added to the routing table)?

What kernel version. The route cache has been completely removed from
the kernel for a long time.