netdev - Re: [PATCH v9 vfio 2/7] vfio/pds: Initial support for pds

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230504132001.32b72926@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 13:20:01 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Cc: Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@....com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com, yishaih@...dia.com,
 shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com, kevin.tian@...el.com,
 shannon.nelson@....com, drivers@...sando.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 vfio 2/7] vfio/pds: Initial support for pds_vfio VFIO
 driver

On Thu, 4 May 2023 14:26:43 -0300 Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> This indenting scheme is not kernel style. I generally suggest people
> run their code through clang-format and go through and take most of
> the changes. Most of what it sugges for this series is good
> 
> This GNU style of left aligning the function name should not be
> in the kernel.

FTR that's not a kernel-wide rule. Please scope your coding style
suggestions to your subsystem, you may confuse people.