netdev - [PATCH v2] net: ipconfig: Allow DNS to be overwritten by DHCPACK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 10:00:04 +0200
From: Martin Wetterwald <martin@...terwald.eu>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...nel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] net: ipconfig: Allow DNS to be overwritten by DHCPACK

Some DHCP server implementations only send the important requested DHCP
options in the final BOOTP reply (DHCPACK).
One example is systemd-networkd.
However, RFC2131, in section 4.3.1 states:

> The server MUST return to the client:
> [...]
> o Parameters requested by the client, according to the following
>   rules:
>
>      -- IF the server has been explicitly configured with a default
>         value for the parameter, the server MUST include that value
>         in an appropriate option in the 'option' field, ELSE

I've reported the issue here:
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/27471

Linux PNP DHCP client implementation only takes into account the DNS
servers received in the first BOOTP reply (DHCPOFFER).
This usually isn't an issue as servers are required to put the same
values in the DHCPOFFER and DHCPACK.
However, RFC2131, in section 4.3.2 states:

> Any configuration parameters in the DHCPACK message SHOULD NOT
> conflict with those in the earlier DHCPOFFER message to which the
> client is responding.  The client SHOULD use the parameters in the
> DHCPACK message for configuration.

When making Linux PNP DHCP client (cmdline ip=dhcp) interact with
systemd-networkd DHCP server, an interesting "protocol misunderstanding"
happens:
Because DNS servers were only specified in the DHCPACK and not in the
DHCPOFFER, Linux will not catch the correct DNS servers: in the first
BOOTP reply (DHCPOFFER), it sees that there is no DNS, and sets as
fallback the IP of the DHCP server itself. When the second BOOTP reply
comes (DHCPACK), it's already too late: the kernel will not overwrite
the fallback setting it has set previously.

This patch makes the kernel overwrite its fallback DNS by DNS servers
specified in the DHCPACK if any.
---
v2:
  - Only overwrite DNS servers if it was the fallback DNS.

 net/ipv4/ipconfig.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c b/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c
index e90bc0aa85c7..aa90273073c1 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ipconfig.c
@@ -179,6 +179,9 @@ static volatile int ic_got_reply __initdata;    /*
Proto(s) that replied */
 #endif
 #ifdef IPCONFIG_DHCP
 static int ic_dhcp_msgtype __initdata;    /* DHCP msg type received */
+
+/* DHCPACK can overwrite DNS if fallback was set upon first BOOTP reply */
+static int ic_nameservers_fallback __initdata;
 #endif


@@ -938,7 +941,12 @@ static void __init ic_do_bootp_ext(u8 *ext)
         if (servers > CONF_NAMESERVERS_MAX)
             servers = CONF_NAMESERVERS_MAX;
         for (i = 0; i < servers; i++) {
+#ifdef IPCONFIG_DHCP
+            if (ic_nameservers[i] == NONE ||
+                ic_nameservers_fallback)
+#else
             if (ic_nameservers[i] == NONE)
+#endif
                 memcpy(&ic_nameservers[i], ext+1+4*i, 4);
         }
         break;
@@ -1158,8 +1166,12 @@ static int __init ic_bootp_recv(struct sk_buff
*skb, struct net_device *dev, str
     ic_addrservaddr = b->iph.saddr;
     if (ic_gateway == NONE && b->relay_ip)
         ic_gateway = b->relay_ip;
-    if (ic_nameservers[0] == NONE)
+    if (ic_nameservers[0] == NONE) {
         ic_nameservers[0] = ic_servaddr;
+#ifdef IPCONFIG_DHCP
+        ic_nameservers_fallback = 1;
+#endif
+    }
     ic_got_reply = IC_BOOTP;

 drop_unlock:
-- 
2.40.1