[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8146fc21-9fdd-37fd-434a-c5705934d4a4@amd.com>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 08:35:03 -0700
From: Brett Creeley <bcreeley@....com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@....com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, alex.williamson@...hat.com,
yishaih@...dia.com, shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com,
kevin.tian@...el.com, shannon.nelson@....com, drivers@...sando.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 vfio 2/7] vfio/pds: Initial support for pds_vfio VFIO
driver
On 5/4/2023 10:26 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 06:06:37PM -0700, Brett Creeley wrote:
>
>> +static int
>> +pds_vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
>> + const struct pci_device_id *id)
>> +{
>
> This indenting scheme is not kernel style. I generally suggest people
> run their code through clang-format and go through and take most of
> the changes. Most of what it sugges for this series is good
>
> This GNU style of left aligning the function name should not be
> in the kernel.
>
> Jason
I will align and fix it in the next revision. Thanks for the review.
Brett
Powered by blists - more mailing lists