netdev - Re: [PATCH v4] virtio_net: suppress cpu stall when free_unused

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sat, 6 May 2023 10:04:23 +0800
From: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc: mst@...hat.com,
 davem@...emloft.net,
 edumazet@...gle.com,
 kuba@...nel.org,
 pabeni@...hat.com,
 zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
 willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com,
 virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Wenliang Wang <wangwenliang.1995@...edance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] virtio_net: suppress cpu stall when free_unused_bufs

On Fri, 5 May 2023 11:28:25 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 10:27 AM Wenliang Wang
> <wangwenliang.1995@...edance.com> wrote:
> >
> > For multi-queue and large ring-size use case, the following error
> > occurred when free_unused_bufs:
> > rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU.
> >
> > Fixes: 986a4f4d452d ("virtio_net: multiqueue support")
> > Signed-off-by: Wenliang Wang <wangwenliang.1995@...edance.com>
> > ---
> > v2:
> > -add need_resched check.
> > -apply same logic to sq.
> > v3:
> > -use cond_resched instead.
> > v4:
> > -add fixes tag
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio_net.c | 2 ++
> >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > index 8d8038538fc4..a12ae26db0e2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> > @@ -3560,12 +3560,14 @@ static void free_unused_bufs(struct virtnet_info *vi)
> >                 struct virtqueue *vq = vi->sq[i].vq;
> >                 while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq)) != NULL)
> >                         virtnet_sq_free_unused_buf(vq, buf);
> > +               cond_resched();
>
> Does this really address the case when the virtqueue is very large?

Yes, I also have this question. I think cond_resched() should be called every
time a certain number of buffers are processed.

Thanks.

>
> Thanks
>
> >         }
> >
> >         for (i = 0; i < vi->max_queue_pairs; i++) {
> >                 struct virtqueue *vq = vi->rq[i].vq;
> >                 while ((buf = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(vq)) != NULL)
> >                         virtnet_rq_free_unused_buf(vq, buf);
> > +               cond_resched();
> >         }
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 2.20.1
> >
>