netdev - Re: [PATCH 00/11] leds: introduce new LED hw control APIs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230508125253.GW29365@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 14:52:53 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] leds: introduce new LED hw control APIs

On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 02:33:25PM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 02:25:14PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
> > 
> > On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 02:15:30AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> > > This is a continue of [1]. It was decided to take a more gradual
> > > approach to implement LEDs support for switch and phy starting with
> > > basic support and then implementing the hw control part when we have all
> > > the prereq done.
> > 
> > I tried to apply this series to give it a try. To what tree should this
> > series be applied upon?
> >
> 
> Hi,
> since this feature affect multiple branch, the prereq of this branch are
> still not in linux-next. (the prereq series got accepted but still has
> to be merged)
> 
> Lee created a branch.

Ok, this explains it, thanks.

> 
> We are waiting for RC stage to request a stable branch so we can
> reference ti to correctly test this.
> 
> Anyway you should be able to apply this series on top of this branch [1]
> 
> Consider that a v2 is almost ready with some crucial changes that should
> improve the implementation. (so if you are planning on adding support
> for other device I advice to check also v2, just an additional ops to
> implement)

I'll wait for v2 then. My ultimate goal is to implement LED trigger support
for the DP83867 phy. It would be great if you could Cc me on v2 so I get
a trigger once it's out.

Thanks for working on this topic. It pops up here every once in a while
and it would be good to get it solved.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |