[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZFlOfymAc8vgboO4@corigine.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 21:33:19 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: stmmac: dwmac-visconti: Make
visconti_eth_clock_remove() return void
On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 04:26:28PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The function returns zero unconditionally. Change it to return void
> instead which simplifies one caller as error handing becomes
> unnecessary.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists