netdev - Re: [PATCH ipsec] xfrm: Reject optional tunnel/BEET mode templates in outbound policies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZFiPyZvW2PhPZHlv@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 07:59:37 +0200
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: Tobias Brunner <tobias@...ongswan.org>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "David
 S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH ipsec] xfrm: Reject optional tunnel/BEET mode templates
 in outbound policies

On Fri, May 05, 2023 at 12:16:16PM +0200, Tobias Brunner wrote:
> xfrm_state_find() uses `encap_family` of the current template with
> the passed local and remote addresses to find a matching state.
> If an optional tunnel or BEET mode template is skipped in a mixed-family
> scenario, there could be a mismatch causing an out-of-bounds read as
> the addresses were not replaced to match the family of the next template.
> 
> While there are theoretical use cases for optional templates in outbound
> policies, the only practical one is to skip IPComp states in inbound
> policies if uncompressed packets are received that are handled by an
> implicitly created IPIP state instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tobias Brunner <tobias@...ongswan.org>

Your patch seems to be corrupt:

warning: Patch sent with format=flowed; space at the end of lines might be lost.
Applying: af_key: Reject optional tunnel/BEET mode templates in outbound policies
error: corrupt patch at line 18

Also, please add a 'Fixes' tag, so that it can be backported.

Thanks!