netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH] SUNRPC: Fix UAF in svc_tcp_listen_data

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <04e00a96-5923-cd8f-78ab-752a6b34f8af@sangfor.com.cn>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 14:28:55 +0800
From: Ding Hui <dinghui@...gfor.com.cn>
To: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc: "jlayton@...nel.org" <jlayton@...nel.org>,
 "trond.myklebust@...merspace.com" <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
 "anna@...nel.org" <anna@...nel.org>,
 "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com"
 <pabeni@...hat.com>, Bruce Fields <bfields@...hat.com>,
 Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
 "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] SUNRPC: Fix UAF in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready()

On 2023/5/8 12:00, Chuck Lever III wrote:
> 
> 
>> On May 7, 2023, at 6:32 PM, Ding Hui <dinghui@...gfor.com.cn> wrote:
>>
>> On 2023/5/7 23:26, Chuck Lever III wrote:
>>>> On May 7, 2023, at 5:11 AM, Ding Hui <dinghui@...gfor.com.cn> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> After the listener svc_sock freed, and before invoking svc_tcp_accept()
>>>> for the established child sock, there is a window that the newsock
>>>> retaining a freed listener svc_sock in sk_user_data which cloning from
>>>> parent. In the race windows if data is received on the newsock, we will
>>>> observe use-after-free report in svc_tcp_listen_data_ready().
>>> My thought is that not calling sk_odata() for the newsock
>>> could potentially result in missing a data_ready event,
>>> resulting in a hung client on that socket.
>>
>> I checked the vmcore, found that sk_odata points to sock_def_readable(),
>> and the sk_wq of newsock is NULL, which be assigned by sk_clone_lock()
>> unconditionally.
>>
>> Calling sk_odata() for the newsock maybe do not wake up any sleepers.
>>
>>> IMO the preferred approach is to ensure that svsk is always
>>> safe to dereference in tcp_listen_data_ready. I haven't yet
>>> thought carefully about how to do that.
>>
>> Agree, but I don't have a good way for now.
> 
> Would a smartly-placed svc_xprt_get() hold the listener in place
> until accept processing completes?
> 

It is difficult and complicated to me. I think it's a little bit out of
SUNRPC's control for the newsocks before accepted, e.g.: we don't know
how many they have.

Back to this RFC, I checked the code and thought it is safe by skipping
sk_odata() for the newsocks before accepted in **svc_tcp_listen_data_ready()**,
since these newsocks's sk_wq must be NULL, and will be assigned new one in
sock_alloc_inode() called by kernel_accept(), so we can say if the child sock
is not be accepted, there is nothing to be waked up.

> 
>>>> Reproduce by two tasks:
>>>> ...

-- 
Thanks,
- Ding Hui