[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB41078CDC3B97ED88AF71DEBFDC769@DM6PR11MB4107.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 18:04:47 +0000
From: "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, "Zhang, Cathy" <cathy.zhang@...el.com>
CC: "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>, "davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Brandeburg, Jesse"
<jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, "Srinivas, Suresh" <suresh.srinivas@...el.com>,
"You, Lizhen" <lizhen.you@...el.com>, "eric.dumazet@...il.com"
<eric.dumazet@...il.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "cgroups@...r.kernel.org"
<cgroups@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: Keep sk->sk_forward_alloc as a proper
size
>>
>> Run memcached with memtier_benchamrk to verify the optimization fix. 8
>> server-client pairs are created with bridge network on localhost,
>> server and client of the same pair share 28 logical CPUs.
>>
> >Results (Average for 5 run)
> >RPS (with/without patch) +2.07x
> >
>Do you have regression data from any production workload? Please keep in mind that many times we (MM subsystem) accepts the regressions of microbenchmarks over complicated optimizations. So, if there is a real production regression, please be very explicit about it.
Though memcached is actually used by people in production. So this isn't an unrealistic scenario.
Tim
Powered by blists - more mailing lists