netdev - Re: [PATCH 02/13] wifi: mwifiex: Use default @max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <168370831930.27943.10511536922121448331.kvalo@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 08:45:21 +0000 (UTC)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: jiangshanlai@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel-team@...a.com, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
 Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
 Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@...il.com>,
 Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@....com>,
 Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/13] wifi: mwifiex: Use default @max_active for
 workqueues

Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:

> These workqueues only host a single work item and thus doen't need explicit
> concurrency limit. Let's use the default @max_active. This doesn't cost
> anything and clearly expresses that @max_active doesn't matter.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>
> Cc: Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi017@...il.com>
> Cc: Sharvari Harisangam <sharvari.harisangam@....com>
> Cc: Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>
> Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org

I didn't review the patch but I assume it's ok. Feel free to take it via your
tree:

Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>

Patch set to Not Applicable.

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/patch/20230509015032.3768622-3-tj@kernel.org/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches