lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 11:49:49 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
 Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Linux Intel LAN Drivers <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
 Linux Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Fwd: e1000e - slow receive / rx - i219-LM (Alder Lake)

Hi,

I noticed a regression report on bugzilla [1]. As many developers don't
take a look on it, I decided to forward it by email. To reach the
reporter, though, you need to log in to bugzilla.

Quoting from the report:
>  Scott Silverman 2023-03-03 17:55:10 UTC > When running kernels 5.15 and newer, poor rx speeds are observed on Alder Lake i219-LM (8086:1A1C) on a Dell Precision 3260 Compact.
> 
> To Reproduce:
> Using iperf3 from the system under test:
> `iperf3 -c <server on local LAN> -R`
> 
> Under kernels 5.7-5.14 (inclusive) performance is near line rate, ~990 Mbps.
> From kernels 5.15 through 6.2 performance is approximately 10-20 Mbps.
> 
> Also of note, the issue doesn't present with servers over the internet (i.e. higher latency links). Over a link with a latency of approximately 20ms I was able to achieve about 600Mbps.
> 
> Interesting workaround, on affected kernels (5.15+) I am able to resolve the issue if an additional device is installed into the systems PCIe slot (tested with an Intel i210 NIC (not connected to LAN) and an Nvidia Quadro P620 GPU).

See bugzilla for details.

To the reporter: It had been great if you also test the latest mainline
(6.4-rc1) to see if this regression has been already fixed.

Anyway, I'm adding this to regzbot:

#regzbot introduced: v5.14..v5.15 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217120
#regzbot title: e1000e performance drop (slow receive/rx) on i219-LM (Alder Lake)

Thanks.

[1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217120

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ