lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CH3PR11MB73456988A38EB575F99699CCFC779@CH3PR11MB7345.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 06:54:28 +0000 From: "Zhang, Cathy" <cathy.zhang@...el.com> To: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org> CC: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, "Srinivas, Suresh" <suresh.srinivas@...el.com>, "Chen, Tim C" <tim.c.chen@...el.com>, "You, Lizhen" <lizhen.you@...el.com>, "eric.dumazet@...il.com" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org> Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: Keep sk->sk_forward_alloc as a proper size Hi Shakeel, Thanks for taking your time to help review! > -----Original Message----- > From: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com> > Sent: Wednesday, May 10, 2023 12:10 AM > To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>; Linux MM <linux- > mm@...ck.org>; Cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org> > Cc: Zhang, Cathy <cathy.zhang@...el.com>; Paolo Abeni > <pabeni@...hat.com>; davem@...emloft.net; kuba@...nel.org; > Brandeburg, Jesse <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>; Srinivas, Suresh > <suresh.srinivas@...el.com>; Chen, Tim C <tim.c.chen@...el.com>; You, > Lizhen <lizhen.you@...el.com>; eric.dumazet@...il.com; > netdev@...r.kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] net: Keep sk->sk_forward_alloc as a proper > size > > +linux-mm & cgroup > > Thread: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230508020801.10702-1- > cathy.zhang@...el.com/ > > On Tue, May 9, 2023 at 8:43 AM Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> > wrote: > > > [...] > > Some mm experts should chime in, this is not a networking issue. > > Most of the MM folks are busy in LSFMM this week. I will take a look at this > soon.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists