netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 3/5] dt-bindings: net: phy: add timestamp preferred choice property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230511162203.5e9ebcf4@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 16:22:03 +0200
From: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, kuba@...nel.org, glipus@...il.com,
 maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com, vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev,
 richardcochran@...il.com, gerhard@...leder-embedded.com,
 thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
 robh+dt@...nel.org, linux@...linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 3/5] dt-bindings: net: phy: add
 timestamp preferred choice property

On Thu, 11 May 2023 16:56:31 +0300
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> wrote:

> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 03:25:50PM +0200, Köry Maincent wrote:

> 
> I guess the general rule of thumb is - if a functionality can live outside
> the kernel or of the device tree, it's probably better that it does.

Ok it is clearer to me. Thanks for your explanation! Then I will drop the
device tree parameter.