netdev - Re: [PATCH net] MAINTAINERS: exclude wireless drivers from netdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d505bf5bbcd0f13a37f9c8465667e355ce20bc26.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 18:38:37 +0200
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, 
	kvalo@...nel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] MAINTAINERS: exclude wireless drivers from netdev

On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 09:03 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> It seems that we mostly get netdev CCed on wireless patches
> which are written by people who don't know any better and
> CC everything that get_maintainers spits out. Rather than
> patches which indeed could benefit from general networking
> review.
> 
> Marking them down in patchwork as Awaiting Upstream is
> a bit tedious.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> ---
> CC: kvalo@...nel.org
> CC: johannes@...solutions.net
> CC: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
> 
> Is this okay with everyone?
> 

Yeah, makes sense.

Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>

Are you going to take it (since you marked it 'net')?

johannes