netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next] net: enc28j60: Use threaded interrupt instead of workqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230511184818.GV38143@unreal>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 21:48:18 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...bus.com>,
	Zhi Han <hanzhi09@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: enc28j60: Use threaded interrupt instead
 of workqueue

On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 08:51:28AM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 11 May 2023 09:59:17 +0300 Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > And this is mainly the issue here. Lukas changes are not different from
> > what many of us doing when we submit internal patches. We change/update/rewrite
> > patches which make them different from internal variant.
> > 
> > Once the patches are public, they will have relevant changelog section.
> > 
> > I don't see how modifying-patches.rst can be seen differently.
> > 
> > BTW, Regarding know-to-blame reasoning, everyone who added his
> > Signed-off-by to the patch is immediately suspicious.
> 
> Right, modifying-patches.rst does not apply to corpo patches.
> 
> Maybe the analogy from US law would be helpful to show how I think
> about it -- corporation (especially working on its own product)
> is one "legal person", Philipp and Lukas are separate "human persons".

You have no reliable way to know the relation between person A and person B.

> 
> IOW patch circulation and attribution within a corporation is naturally
> different than between community members.

Yes and no, it is very dependant on corporation.

Thanks