[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <985b617-c5d7-dce3-318b-f2f8412beed3@linux.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 23:00:02 +0300 (EEST)
From: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
cc: linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>, nic_swsd@...ltek.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/17] r8169: Use pcie_lnkctl_clear_and_set() for changing
LNKCTL
On Thu, 11 May 2023, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> On 11.05.2023 15:14, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> > Don't assume that only the driver would be accessing LNKCTL. ASPM
> > policy changes can trigger write to LNKCTL outside of driver's control.
> >
> > Use pcie_lnkctl_clear_and_set() which does proper locking to avoid
> > losing concurrent updates to the register value.
> >
>
> Wouldn't it be more appropriate to add proper locking to the
> underlying pcie_capability_clear_and_set_word()?
As per discussion for the other patch, that's where this series is now
aiming to in v2.
--
i.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists