[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230511-unhidden-mummify-800fe847e25d@spud>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 23:29:20 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Cc: Pranavi Somisetty <pranavi.somisetty@....com>,
nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com, claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, richardcochran@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
palmer@...belt.com, git@....com, michal.simek@....com,
harini.katakam@....com, radhey.shyam.pandey@....com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] dt-bindings: net: cdns,macb: Add
rx-watermark property
On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 08:25:15AM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 01:12:13AM -0600, Pranavi Somisetty wrote:
> > watermark value is the minimum amount of packet data
> > required to activate the forwarding process. The watermark
> > implementation and maximum size is dependent on the device
> > where Cadence MACB/GEM is used.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pranavi Somisetty <pranavi.somisetty@....com>
>
> Please send dt-binding patches to the dt-binding maintainers and list.
> get_maintainer.pl should have told you to do so & without having done
> so, the bindings will not get tested :/
The automation we run for the linux-riscv did actually run against
this though, and even dtbs_check complains about this binding:
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/cdns,macb.yaml: properties:rx-watermark:maxItems: False schema does not allow 1
hint: Scalar properties should not have array keywords
from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/keywords.yaml#
Please test your bindings :/
Cheers,
Conor.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists