netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bonding: Always assign be16 value to vlan

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 11:30:12 +0200
From: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bonding: Always assign be16 value to
 vlan_proto

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 11:29:06AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 04:43:57PM -0700, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> > Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org> wrote:
> > 
> > >The type of the vlan_proto field is __be16.
> > >And most users of the field use it as such.
> > >
> > >In the case of setting or testing the field for the special VLAN_N_VID
> > >value, host byte order is used. Which seems incorrect.
> > >
> > >It also seems somewhat odd to store a VLAN ID value in a field that is
> > >otherwise used to store Ether types.
> > >
> > >Address this issue by defining BOND_VLAN_PROTO_NONE, a big endian value.
> > >0xffff was chosen somewhat arbitrarily. What is important is that it
> > >doesn't overlap with any valid VLAN Ether types.
> > 
> > As I think you mentioned, 0xffff is marked as a reserved ethertype.
> 
> Yes, it seems that I did. It is reserved in RFC-1701.
> 
> I can work it into the patch description if you like - there is no
> particular reason I didn't for v2.
> 
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZEI0zpDyJtfogO7s@kernel.org/
> [2] https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1701.html
> [3] https://www.iana.org/assignments/ieee-802-numbers/ieee-802-numbers.xhtml

I guess there will be no v2 as v2 was accepted :)

  - [net-next,v2] bonding: Always assign be16 value to vlan_proto
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/c1bc7d73c964

In any case, this is now documented in the ML archives.