netdev - Re: [PATCH net] MAINTAINERS: exclude wireless drivers from netdev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87y1lumbwo.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 07:06:15 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,  davem@...emloft.net,  netdev@...r.kernel.org,  edumazet@...gle.com,  pabeni@...hat.com,  linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] MAINTAINERS: exclude wireless drivers from netdev

Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:

> On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 09:03 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>> It seems that we mostly get netdev CCed on wireless patches
>> which are written by people who don't know any better and
>> CC everything that get_maintainers spits out. Rather than
>> patches which indeed could benefit from general networking
>> review.
>> 
>> Marking them down in patchwork as Awaiting Upstream is
>> a bit tedious.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> CC: kvalo@...nel.org
>> CC: johannes@...solutions.net
>> CC: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
>> 
>> Is this okay with everyone?
>> 
>
> Yeah, makes sense.
>
> Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>

I didn't even know about 'X', a very good idea:

Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches