lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <87y1lumbwo.fsf@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 12 May 2023 07:06:15 +0300 From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com, pabeni@...hat.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net] MAINTAINERS: exclude wireless drivers from netdev Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes: > On Thu, 2023-05-11 at 09:03 -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote: >> It seems that we mostly get netdev CCed on wireless patches >> which are written by people who don't know any better and >> CC everything that get_maintainers spits out. Rather than >> patches which indeed could benefit from general networking >> review. >> >> Marking them down in patchwork as Awaiting Upstream is >> a bit tedious. >> >> Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> >> --- >> CC: kvalo@...nel.org >> CC: johannes@...solutions.net >> CC: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org >> >> Is this okay with everyone? >> > > Yeah, makes sense. > > Acked-by: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> I didn't even know about 'X', a very good idea: Acked-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
Powered by blists - more mailing lists