[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<168400502086.13341.13192654722542171149.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 19:10:20 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Vladimir Nikishkin <vladimir@...ishkin.pw>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, eng.alaamohamedsoliman.am@...il.com,
gnault@...hat.com, razor@...ckwall.org, idosch@...dia.com,
liuhangbin@...il.com, eyal.birger@...il.com, jtoppins@...hat.com,
shuah@...nel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 1/2] net: vxlan: Add nolocalbypass option to
vxlan.
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>:
On Fri, 12 May 2023 11:40:33 +0800 you wrote:
> If a packet needs to be encapsulated towards a local destination IP, the
> packet will undergo a "local bypass" and be injected into the Rx path as
> if it was received by the target VXLAN device without undergoing
> encapsulation. If such a device does not exist, the packet will be
> dropped.
>
> There are scenarios where we do not want to perform such a bypass, but
> instead want the packet to be encapsulated and locally received by a
> user space program for post-processing.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net-next,v9,1/2] net: vxlan: Add nolocalbypass option to vxlan.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/69474a8a5837
- [net-next,v9,2/2] selftests: net: vxlan: Add tests for vxlan nolocalbypass option.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/305c04189997
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists