[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGIW8CHEX7iBJqgr@corigine.com>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 13:26:40 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>, Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@...nel.org>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Shayne Chen <shayne.chen@...iatek.com>,
Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Alexander Couzens <lynxis@...0.eu>,
Sujuan Chen <sujuan.chen@...iatek.com>,
Bo Jiao <bo.jiao@...iatek.com>,
Nicolas Cavallari <nicolas.cavallari@...en-communications.fr>,
Howard Hsu <howard-yh.hsu@...iatek.com>,
MeiChia Chiu <MeiChia.Chiu@...iatek.com>,
Peter Chiu <chui-hao.chiu@...iatek.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Wang Yufen <wangyufen@...wei.com>, Lorenz Brun <lorenz@...n.one>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: mt76: mt7915: add support for MT7981
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 02:08:22PM +0300, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org> writes:
>
> > On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 04:53:43PM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> >> On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 03:35:51PM +0200, Daniel Golle wrote:
> >> > From: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@...0.eu>
> >> >
> >> > Add support for the MediaTek MT7981 SoC which is similar to the MT7986
> >> > but with a newer IP cores and only 2x ARM Cortex-A53 instead of 4x.
> >> > Unlike MT7986 the MT7981 can only connect a single wireless frontend,
> >> > usually MT7976 is used for DBDC.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@...0.eu>
> >> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
> >>
> >> ...
> >>
> >> > @@ -489,7 +516,10 @@ static int mt7986_wmac_adie_patch_7976(struct mt7915_dev *dev, u8 adie)
> >> > rg_xo_01 = 0x1d59080f;
> >> > rg_xo_03 = 0x34c00fe0;
> >> > } else {
> >> > - rg_xo_01 = 0x1959f80f;
> >> > + if (is_mt7981(&dev->mt76))
> >> > + rg_xo_01 = 0x1959c80f;
> >> > + else if (is_mt7986(&dev->mt76))
> >> > + rg_xo_01 = 0x1959f80f;
> >>
> >> Hi Daniel,
> >>
> >> rg_xo_01 will be used uninitialised below if we get here
> >> and neither of the conditions above are true.
> >>
> >> Can this occur?
> >
> > No, it cannot occur. Either of is_mt7981() or is_mt7986() will return
> > true, as the driver is bound via one of the two compatibles
> > 'mediatek,mt7986-wmac' or newly added 'mediatek,mt7981-wmac'.
> > Based on that the match_data is either 0x7986 or 0x7981, which is then
> > used as chip_id, which is used by the is_mt7981() and is_mt7986()
> > functions.
>
> But what if later more changes are made, for example a third compatible
> is added? It would be good to add a warning or something else to protect
> that.
>
> And I would not be a surpised if a compiler or static analyser would
> even warn about the uninitialised variable.
FWIIW, gcc-12 [-Wmaybe-uninitialized], clang-16 [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
and smatch warn about this.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists