lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230516103109.3066-11-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 12:31:09 +0200
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...il.com>
To: magnus.karlsson@...el.com,
	bjorn@...nel.org,
	ast@...nel.org,
	daniel@...earbox.net,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com,
	bpf@...r.kernel.org,
	yhs@...com,
	andrii@...nel.org,
	martin.lau@...ux.dev,
	song@...nel.org,
	john.fastabend@...il.com,
	kpsingh@...nel.org,
	sdf@...gle.com,
	haoluo@...gle.com,
	jolsa@...nel.org,
	tirthendu.sarkar@...el.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/10] selftests/xsk: adjust packet pacing for multi-buffer support

From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>

Modify the packet pacing algorithm so that it works with multi-buffer
packets. This algorithm makes sure we do not send too many buffers to
the receiving thread so that packets have to be dropped. The previous
algorithm made the assumption that each packet only consumes one
buffer, but that is not true anymore when multi-buffer support gets
added. Instead, we find out what the largest packet size is in the
packet stream and assume that each packet will consume this many
buffers. This is conservative and overly cautious as there might be
smaller packets in the stream that need fewer buffers per packet. But
it keeps the algorithm simple.

Also simplify it by removing the pthread conditional and just test if
there is enough space in the Rx thread before trying to send one more
batch. Also makes the tests run faster.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c | 48 ++++++++++++++----------
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
index b48017611499..218d7f694e5c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.c
@@ -555,6 +555,11 @@ static void pkt_set(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, struct pkt *pkt, int offset, u32
 		pkt->valid = true;
 }
 
+static u32 pkt_get_buffer_len(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u32 len)
+{
+	return ceil_u32(len, umem->frame_size) * umem->frame_size;
+}
+
 static struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream_generate(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u32 nb_pkts, u32 pkt_len)
 {
 	struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream;
@@ -564,6 +569,8 @@ static struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream_generate(struct xsk_umem_info *umem, u32 nb
 	if (!pkt_stream)
 		exit_with_error(ENOMEM);
 
+	pkt_stream->nb_pkts = nb_pkts;
+	pkt_stream->max_pkt_len = pkt_len;
 	for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
 		struct pkt *pkt = &pkt_stream->pkts[i];
 
@@ -661,10 +668,14 @@ static void __pkt_stream_generate_custom(struct ifobject *ifobj,
 		exit_with_error(ENOMEM);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
-		pkt_stream->pkts[i].offset = pkts[i].offset;
-		pkt_stream->pkts[i].len = pkts[i].len;
-		pkt_stream->pkts[i].pkt_nb = i;
-		pkt_stream->pkts[i].valid = pkts[i].valid;
+		struct pkt *pkt = &pkt_stream->pkts[i];
+
+		pkt->offset = pkts[i].offset;
+		pkt->len = pkts[i].len;
+		pkt->pkt_nb = i;
+		pkt->valid = pkts[i].valid;
+		if (pkt->len > pkt_stream->max_pkt_len)
+			pkt_stream->max_pkt_len = pkt->len;
 	}
 
 	ifobj->pkt_stream = pkt_stream;
@@ -926,8 +937,6 @@ static int receive_pkts(struct test_spec *test, struct pollfd *fds)
 
 		pthread_mutex_lock(&pacing_mutex);
 		pkts_in_flight -= pkts_sent;
-		if (pkts_in_flight < umem->num_frames)
-			pthread_cond_signal(&pacing_cond);
 		pthread_mutex_unlock(&pacing_mutex);
 		pkts_sent = 0;
 	}
@@ -938,10 +947,18 @@ static int receive_pkts(struct test_spec *test, struct pollfd *fds)
 static int __send_pkts(struct ifobject *ifobject, struct pollfd *fds, bool timeout)
 {
 	struct xsk_socket_info *xsk = ifobject->xsk;
+	struct xsk_umem_info *umem = ifobject->umem;
+	u32 i, idx = 0, valid_pkts = 0, buffer_len;
 	bool use_poll = ifobject->use_poll;
-	u32 i, idx = 0, valid_pkts = 0;
 	int ret;
 
+	buffer_len = pkt_get_buffer_len(umem, ifobject->pkt_stream->max_pkt_len);
+	/* pkts_in_flight might be negative if many invalid packets are sent */
+	if (pkts_in_flight >= (int)((umem_size(umem) - BATCH_SIZE * buffer_len) / buffer_len)) {
+		kick_tx(xsk);
+		return TEST_CONTINUE;
+	}
+
 	while (xsk_ring_prod__reserve(&xsk->tx, BATCH_SIZE, &idx) < BATCH_SIZE) {
 		if (use_poll) {
 			ret = poll(fds, 1, POLL_TMOUT);
@@ -972,7 +989,7 @@ static int __send_pkts(struct ifobject *ifobject, struct pollfd *fds, bool timeo
 		if (!pkt)
 			break;
 
-		tx_desc->addr = pkt_get_addr(pkt, ifobject->umem);
+		tx_desc->addr = pkt_get_addr(pkt, umem);
 		tx_desc->len = pkt->len;
 		if (pkt->valid) {
 			valid_pkts++;
@@ -982,11 +999,6 @@ static int __send_pkts(struct ifobject *ifobject, struct pollfd *fds, bool timeo
 
 	pthread_mutex_lock(&pacing_mutex);
 	pkts_in_flight += valid_pkts;
-	/* pkts_in_flight might be negative if many invalid packets are sent */
-	if (pkts_in_flight >= (int)(ifobject->umem->num_frames - BATCH_SIZE)) {
-		kick_tx(xsk);
-		pthread_cond_wait(&pacing_cond, &pacing_mutex);
-	}
 	pthread_mutex_unlock(&pacing_mutex);
 
 	xsk_ring_prod__submit(&xsk->tx, i);
@@ -1032,9 +1044,11 @@ static int send_pkts(struct test_spec *test, struct ifobject *ifobject)
 
 	while (pkt_stream->current_pkt_nb < pkt_stream->nb_pkts) {
 		ret = __send_pkts(ifobject, &fds, timeout);
+		if (ret == TEST_CONTINUE && !test->fail)
+			continue;
 		if ((ret || test->fail) && !timeout)
 			return TEST_FAILURE;
-		else if (ret == TEST_PASS && timeout)
+		if (ret == TEST_PASS && timeout)
 			return ret;
 	}
 
@@ -1319,12 +1333,8 @@ static void *worker_testapp_validate_rx(void *arg)
 
 	if (!err && ifobject->validation_func)
 		err = ifobject->validation_func(ifobject);
-	if (err) {
+	if (err)
 		report_failure(test);
-		pthread_mutex_lock(&pacing_mutex);
-		pthread_cond_signal(&pacing_cond);
-		pthread_mutex_unlock(&pacing_mutex);
-	}
 
 	pthread_exit(NULL);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
index 00862732e751..aaf27e067640 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xskxceiver.h
@@ -121,6 +121,7 @@ struct pkt_stream {
 	u32 nb_pkts;
 	u32 current_pkt_nb;
 	struct pkt *pkts;
+	u32 max_pkt_len;
 };
 
 struct ifobject;
@@ -173,7 +174,6 @@ struct test_spec {
 
 pthread_barrier_t barr;
 pthread_mutex_t pacing_mutex = PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER;
-pthread_cond_t pacing_cond = PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER;
 
 int pkts_in_flight;
 
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ