[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <00c601d9879a$ea72dd90$bf5898b0$@trustnetic.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 10:05:41 +0800
From: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
To: "'Andy Shevchenko'" <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
<mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
<jsd@...ihalf.com>,
<Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
<andrew@...n.ch>,
<hkallweit1@...il.com>,
<linux@...linux.org.uk>,
<linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<mengyuanlou@...-swift.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v8 6/9] net: txgbe: Support GPIO to SFP socket
On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 5:36 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 02:31:57PM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > Register GPIO chip and handle GPIO IRQ for SFP socket.
>
> ...
>
> > + spin_lock_init(&wx->gpio_lock);
>
> Almost forgot to ask, are you planning to use this GPIO part on PREEMPT_RT
> kernels? Currently you will get a splat in case IRQ is fired.
Hmmm, I don't know much about this. Should I use raw_spinlock_t instead of
spinlock_t?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists