netdev - Re: [Issue] Bonding can't show correct speed if lower interface is bond 802.3ad

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230516151134.GA16113@ti139.telemetry-investments.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 11:11:34 -0400
From: "Andrew J. Schorr" <aschorr@...emetry-investments.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@...onical.com>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Issue] Bonding can't show correct speed if lower interface is
 bond 802.3ad

Hi,

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 10:44:01AM -0400, Andrew J. Schorr wrote:
> OK. So it sounds like this should just work automatically with no
> configuration required to identify which slaves are running in individual
> mode. Thanks for clarifying.

Just to follow up on this -- for test purposes, I booted the system with the 
802.3ad bond containing both the 20 Gbps port-channel and the individual
1 Gbps port on the other switch, and it worked as expected. The only
drawback to this configuration is the lack of ARP monitoring, so I will
stick with the active-backup bond on top of the 802.3ad bond.

Regards,
Andy