[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230516094254.0dce3596@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 09:42:54 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Shenwei Wang <shenwei.wang@....com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
between commit:
6ead9c98cafc ("net: fec: remove the xdp_return_frame when lack of tx BDs")
from the net tree and commit:
144470c88c5d ("net: fec: using the standard return codes when xdp xmit errors")
from the net-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
index 577d94821b3e,cd215ab20ff9..000000000000
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fec_main.c
@@@ -3798,7 -3798,8 +3798,7 @@@ static int fec_enet_txq_xmit_frame(stru
entries_free = fec_enet_get_free_txdesc_num(txq);
if (entries_free < MAX_SKB_FRAGS + 1) {
netdev_err(fep->netdev, "NOT enough BD for SG!\n");
- return NETDEV_TX_BUSY;
- xdp_return_frame(frame);
+ return -EBUSY;
}
/* Fill in a Tx ring entry */
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists