[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGSsbr7oPZAZ4U7V@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 13:29:02 +0300
From: 'Andy Shevchenko' <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jiawen Wu <jiawenwu@...stnetic.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, jsd@...ihalf.com,
Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
linux@...linux.org.uk, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, mengyuanlou@...-swift.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 6/9] net: txgbe: Support GPIO to SFP socket
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 10:05:41AM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 16, 2023 5:36 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 02:31:57PM +0800, Jiawen Wu wrote:
> > > Register GPIO chip and handle GPIO IRQ for SFP socket.
...
> > > + spin_lock_init(&wx->gpio_lock);
> >
> > Almost forgot to ask, are you planning to use this GPIO part on PREEMPT_RT
> > kernels? Currently you will get a splat in case IRQ is fired.
>
> Hmmm, I don't know much about this. Should I use raw_spinlock_t instead of
> spinlock_t?
If you need support PREEMPT_RT.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists