[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <E1pzEXd-005jUW-GP@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 11:37:57 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Cc: Marek BehĂșn <kabel@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/7] net: sfp: swap order of rtnl and st_mutex locks
Swap the order of the rtnl and st_mutex locks - st_mutex is now nested
beneath rtnl lock instead of rtnl being beneath st_mutex. This will
allow us to hold st_mutex only while manipulating the module's hardware
or software control state.
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
---
drivers/net/phy/sfp.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
index 3fc703e4dd21..ffb6c37dac96 100644
--- a/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/phy/sfp.c
@@ -2600,8 +2600,8 @@ static void sfp_check_state(struct sfp *sfp)
{
unsigned int state, i, changed;
- mutex_lock(&sfp->st_mutex);
rtnl_lock();
+ mutex_lock(&sfp->st_mutex);
state = sfp_get_state(sfp);
changed = state ^ sfp->state;
if (sfp->tx_fault_ignore)
@@ -2628,8 +2628,8 @@ static void sfp_check_state(struct sfp *sfp)
if (changed & SFP_F_LOS)
sfp_sm_event(sfp, state & SFP_F_LOS ?
SFP_E_LOS_HIGH : SFP_E_LOS_LOW);
- rtnl_unlock();
mutex_unlock(&sfp->st_mutex);
+ rtnl_unlock();
}
static irqreturn_t sfp_irq(int irq, void *data)
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists