[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e6817987-f788-4567-8406-c257f3b81caf@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 14:32:17 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Doug Berger <doug.berger@...adcom.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: phy: broadcom: Register dummy IRQ handler
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 03:56:39PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
>
> In order to have our interrupt descriptor fully setup, and in particular
> the action, ensure that we register a full fledged interrupt handler.
> This is in particular necessary for the kernel to properly manage early
> wake-up scenarios and arm the wake-up interrupt, otherwise there would
> be risks of missing the interrupt and leaving it in a state where it
> would not be handled correctly at all, including for wake-up purposes.
Hi Florian
I've not seen any other driver do this. Maybe that is just my
ignorance.
Please could you Cc: the interrupt and power management
Maintainers. This seems like a generic problem, and should have a
generic solution.
In the setup which needs this, does the output from the PHY go to a
PMIC, not a SoC interrupt? And i assume the PMIC is not interrupt
capable?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists