[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230517080624.672d52a2@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 08:06:24 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] dt-bindings: net: nxp,sja1105: document
spi-cpol/cpha
On Wed, 17 May 2023 10:26:38 +0200 Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/05/2023 05:10, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 May 2023 13:50:35 +0300 Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:45:25AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> [...]
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> >
> > Is my instinct that this should go to net-next correct?
>
> It would be great missing net-next was pointed out by checkpatch.pl.
FWIW, I'd have taken the patch as is. There isn't much the current
build tester can do for dt-bindings, anyway. But thanks for the resend
:)
I was wondering about checkpatch, too, but haven't come up with any
great solution. The problem is kind of at an intersection of checkpatch
and get_maintainer.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists