[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230517015042.1243644-8-kuba@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2023 18:50:42 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
edumazet@...gle.com,
pabeni@...hat.com,
borisp@...dia.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com,
tariqt@...dia.com,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Shai Amiram <samiram@...dia.com>
Subject: [PATCH net 7/7] tls: rx: strp: don't use GFP_KERNEL in softirq context
When receive buffer is small, or the TCP rx queue looks too
complicated to bother using it directly - we allocate a new
skb and copy data into it.
We already use sk->sk_allocation... but nothing actually
sets it to GFP_ATOMIC on the ->sk_data_ready() path.
Users of HW offload are far more likely to experience problems
due to scheduling while atomic. "Copy mode" is very rarely
triggered with SW crypto.
Fixes: 84c61fe1a75b ("tls: rx: do not use the standard strparser")
Tested-by: Shai Amiram <samiram@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
---
net/tls/tls_sw.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/tls/tls_sw.c b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
index 635b8bf6b937..6e6a7c37d685 100644
--- a/net/tls/tls_sw.c
+++ b/net/tls/tls_sw.c
@@ -2304,10 +2304,14 @@ static void tls_data_ready(struct sock *sk)
struct tls_context *tls_ctx = tls_get_ctx(sk);
struct tls_sw_context_rx *ctx = tls_sw_ctx_rx(tls_ctx);
struct sk_psock *psock;
+ gfp_t alloc_save;
trace_sk_data_ready(sk);
+ alloc_save = sk->sk_allocation;
+ sk->sk_allocation = GFP_ATOMIC;
tls_strp_data_ready(&ctx->strp);
+ sk->sk_allocation = alloc_save;
psock = sk_psock_get(sk);
if (psock) {
--
2.40.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists