netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: mvpp2: Fix error checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 22:14:49 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Yeqi Fu <asuk4.q@...il.com>
Cc: mw@...ihalf.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mvpp2: Fix error checking

On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 03:08:11AM +0800, Yeqi Fu wrote:
> The function debugfs_create_dir returns ERR_PTR if an error occurs,
> and the appropriate way to verify for errors is to use the inline
> function IS_ERR. The patch will substitute the null-comparison with
> IS_ERR.

The comment above debugfs_create_dir includes the following text.

 * NOTE: it's expected that most callers should _ignore_ the errors returned
 * by this function. Other debugfs functions handle the fact that the "dentry"
 * passed to them could be an error and they don't crash in that case.
 * Drivers should generally work fine even if debugfs fails to init anyway.

And I notice that in this same file there are calls to debugfs_create_dir()
where that advice is followed: the return value is ignored.

So I think the correct approach here is to simply remove the error
checking.

And, to answer my own question while reviewing this. I don't think
Fixes tags are warranted, as debugfs_create_dir() is not expected
to return errors, so there shouldn't be a but in practice. At least
that is my reasoning.

--
pw-bot: cr