netdev - Re: [PATCH] net: mvpp2: Fix error checking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 23:06:10 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Yeqi Fu <asuk4.q@...il.com>, mw@...ihalf.com, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ivan Orlov <ivan.orlov0322@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: mvpp2: Fix error checking

On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 09:11:10PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 03:08:11AM +0800, Yeqi Fu wrote:
> > The function debugfs_create_dir returns ERR_PTR if an error occurs,
> > and the appropriate way to verify for errors is to use the inline
> > function IS_ERR. The patch will substitute the null-comparison with
> > IS_ERR.
> 
> Exactly as I said to a very similar patch received a few days ago
> from SikkiLadho:
> 
> "The modern wisdom for debugfs is not to check for any errors, so if
> we're going to touch this, that's the route that any patch should be
> taking.
> 
> Thanks."
> 
> Your patch seems to have the same Suggested-by: which suggests to me
> that you probably know SikkiLadho and are working together with the
> person who suggested the change, so it would be good that when a
> patch from one of you is commented upon, those comments are taken
> into account rather than someone else sending an identical patch to
> the first.

Hi Yeqi

Even better would be you write a patch for the bot you are using to
find these issues and teach it that nothing is actually wrong here, or
suggest to remove all checks.

	Andrew