netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 4/5] net: Let the active time stamping layer be selectable.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 15:19:48 -0700
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Vladimir Oltean
	<vladimir.oltean@....com>
CC: Köry Maincent <kory.maincent@...tlin.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <glipus@...il.com>,
	<maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>, <vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>,
	<richardcochran@...il.com>, <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>,
	<thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>, <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next RFC v4 4/5] net: Let the active time stamping
 layer be selectable.



On 5/11/2023 9:25 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> So we need a bit somewhere (in ops? in some other struct? in output 
> of get_ts?) to let the driver declare that it wants to see all TS
> requests. (I've been using bits in ops, IDK if people find that
> repulsive or neat :))

+1 to using bits in ops for opt-in functionality. I like it.