netdev - RE: [PATCH v3] net: Remove low

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <TY2PR06MB34247F4E2615F7B12AFA2072857E9@TY2PR06MB3424.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2023 06:23:20 +0000
From: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, "dsahern@...nel.org"
	<dsahern@...nel.org>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "idosch@...sch.org" <idosch@...sch.org>,
	"petrm@...dia.com" <petrm@...dia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] net: Remove low_thresh in ip defrag



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2023 11:44 AM
> To: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> Cc: davem@...emloft.net; dsahern@...nel.org; edumazet@...gle.com;
> pabeni@...hat.com; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> idosch@...sch.org; petrm@...dia.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: Remove low_thresh in ip defrag
> 
> On Wed, 17 May 2023 08:18:20 +0800 Angus Chen wrote:
> > As low_thresh has no work in fragment reassembles,mark it to be unused.
> > And Mark it deprecated in sysctl Document.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Angus Chen <angus.chen@...uarmicro.com>
> 
> We need to revert the old patch first, we can't remove the commit from
> the git history because it would change all later hashes and break
> rebasing.
> 
> Why are you renaming the member? Just add the comment and update the
> documentation. You said you had a tested complaint, the tester will
> only read the docs, right?
Yes,I can be did like you and Ido Schimmel just said.
Btw, read the docs is also kind of complicated.
If we can introduce a place ,like /proc/deprecated or somewhere,
then the scripts can read it for realtime check.
After that, we put the deprecate proc entry with a list.
It maybe welcomed by DevOps Engineer also.
> --
> pw-bot: cr