[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6a900cd7-470a-3611-c88a-9f901c56c97f@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2023 09:19:31 -0700
From: "Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@...el.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Emil Tantilov
<emil.s.tantilov@...el.com>
CC: <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <shannon.nelson@....com>,
<simon.horman@...igine.com>, <leon@...nel.org>, <decot@...gle.com>,
<willemb@...gle.com>, <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>,
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<kuba@...nel.org>, <pabeni@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next v4 00/15] Introduce Intel IDPF driver
On 5/11/2023 11:34 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Mon, May 08, 2023 at 12:43:11PM -0700, Emil Tantilov wrote:
>> This patch series introduces the Intel Infrastructure Data Path Function
>> (IDPF) driver. It is used for both physical and virtual functions. Except
>> for some of the device operations the rest of the functionality is the
>> same for both PF and VF. IDPF uses virtchnl version2 opcodes and
>> structures defined in the virtchnl2 header file which helps the driver
>> to learn the capabilities and register offsets from the device
>> Control Plane (CP) instead of assuming the default values.
>
> So, is this for merge in the next cycle? Should this be an RFC rather?
> It seems unlikely that the IDPF specification will be finalized by that
> time - how are you going to handle any specification changes?
Yes. we would like this driver to be merged in the next cycle(6.5).
Based on the community feedback on v1 version of the driver, we removed
all references to OASIS standard and at this time this is an intel
vendor driver.
Links to v1 and v2 discussion threads
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230329140404.1647925-1-pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20230411011354.2619359-1-pavan.kumar.linga@intel.com/
The v1->v2 change log reflects this update.
v1 --> v2: link [1]
* removed the OASIS reference in the commit message to make it clear
that this is an Intel vendor specific driver
Any IDPF specification updates would be handled as part of the changes
that would be required to make this a common standards driver.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists