[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230519145218.659b0104@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 14:52:18 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...dia.com>
Cc: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net, pabeni@...hat.com,
edumazet@...gle.com, roopa@...dia.com, taras.chornyi@...ision.eu,
saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org, petrm@...dia.com,
vladimir.oltean@....com, claudiu.manoil@....com,
alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
taspelund@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] skbuff: bridge: Add layer 2 miss
indication
On Fri, 19 May 2023 16:51:48 +0300 Ido Schimmel wrote:
> diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> index fc17b9fd93e6..274e55455b15 100644
> --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c
> +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c
> @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ static int br_pass_frame_up(struct sk_buff *skb)
> */
> br_switchdev_frame_unmark(skb);
>
> + skb->l2_miss = BR_INPUT_SKB_CB(skb)->miss;
> +
> /* Bridge is just like any other port. Make sure the
> * packet is allowed except in promisc mode when someone
> * may be running packet capture.
>
> Ran these changes through the selftest and it seems to work.
Can we possibly put the new field at the end of the CB and then have TC
look at it in the CB? We already do a bit of such CB juggling in strp
(first member of struct sk_skb_cb).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists