lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230520073428.3781-1-minhuadotchen@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2023 15:34:28 +0800
From: Min-Hua Chen <minhuadotchen@...il.com>
To: kuba@...nel.org
Cc: alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	joabreu@...opsys.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
	minhuadotchen@...il.com,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	peppe.cavallaro@...com,
	simon.horman@...igine.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: stmmac: compare p->des0 and p->des1 with __le32 type values

Hi Jakub,

>We can make working with sparse easier by making sure it doesn't
>generate false positive warnings :\

It will be good if sparse can handle this case correctly.

>
>> (There are around 7000 sparse warning in ARCH=arm64 defconfig build and
>> sometimes it is hard to remember all the false alarm cases)
>>
>> Could you consider taking this patch, please?
>
>No. We don't take patches to address false positive static
>checker warnings.

No problem.

thanks,
Min-Hua

Powered by blists - more mailing lists