netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/17] vsock/virtio: non-linear skb handling for tap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 15:13:46 +0200
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
To: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
	Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
	Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...rdevices.ru,
	oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 04/17] vsock/virtio: non-linear skb handling for
 tap

On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 10:39:37AM +0300, Arseniy Krasnov wrote:
> For tap device new skb is created and data from the current skb is
> copied to it. This adds copying data from non-linear skb to new
> the skb.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
> ---
>  net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> index 16effa8d55d2..9854f48a0544 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> @@ -106,6 +106,27 @@ virtio_transport_alloc_skb(struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info *info,
>  	return NULL;
>  }
>  
> +static void virtio_transport_copy_nonlinear_skb(struct sk_buff *skb,
> +						void *dst,
> +						size_t len)
> +{
> +	struct iov_iter iov_iter = { 0 };
> +	struct iovec iovec;
> +	size_t to_copy;
> +
> +	iovec.iov_base = dst;

Hi Arseniy,

Sparse seems unhappy about this.
Though, TBH, I'm unsure what should be done about it.

.../virtio_transport_common.c:117:24: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different address spaces)
.../virtio_transport_common.c:117:24:    expected void [noderef] __user *iov_base
.../virtio_transport_common.c:117:24:    got void *dst


...